header Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites | RSS/Atom | Sitemap | Contact us
Search the Site   Advanced »
Sections


Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31




email Email to a friend | print Print version | Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us | Digg this story Digg this comment Comments (11 posted)

CRISIS: "Absent Deadbeat Dads!"

By News Desk on 29 December, 2007 12:39:00

image

Massachusetts 2008, the world’s best place to raise a “family?”  ...or are we still committed to teaching those pesky “Absent Deadbeat Dads” a lesson in fatherhood?  Or are 1980s terms (championed by the likes of the outdated Weld administration) like “Absentee Father” and "Deadbeat Dads" an oversimplification to a more complex paradimg? 

.

According to State and National statistics, "fatherlessness" is on the rise.  The United States, the richest nation and arguably the epitome of Western civilization, has roughly 24 million children-or 34 percent of all children in the U.S.-living in homes in which the father is not present. This is the highest percentage of fatherless families in any country in the world. The number of single mothers raising children has tripled since 1960, a heartbreaking statistic when coupled with the fact that children are five times more likely to be living in poverty when the father is absent. Just one of the symptoms of the crisis of fatherlessness is the growing violence in city neighborhoods...

.

Children from fatherless homes are:

.

.15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders.  85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes
• 4.6 times more likely to commit suicide.  63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.
• 6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers
• 24.3 times more likely to run away. 
90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.

• 6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions. 
• 10.8 times more likely to commit rape.  80% of rapist motivated by displaced anger come from fatherless homes.
• 6.6 times more likely to drop out of school.  71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
• 15.3 times more likely to end up in prison while a teenager.  85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home.
• 73% of adolescent murderers come from mother only homes

Daughters who live in mother only homes are 92% more likely to divorce

.

(U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census, Center for Disease Control, National Principals Assoc.)

.

-85% of Massachusetts Voters Recently Voted For Shared Parenting

-In 2003, 20,952 entries for divorce were filed in Massachusetts courts!

-In Massachusetts over 40,000 restraining orders are issued each year!  This is 33 times more than in Virginia with a similar population 

-This has become a HUGE profit making endeavor for lawyers and many others.  It is all driven by the greed and desire for power of special interest groups like lawyers and radical feminists who push one way laws.

-Allegations of family violence are the weapon-of-choice in divorce strategies.  Lawyers, and paralegals in women's shelters, call them "The Silver Bullet".  False abuse allegations work effectively in removing men from their families without due process.  The impact that the removal of fathers has on our children is horrific.

-Massachusetts has the HIGHEST child support in the entire U.S. at about 40% of after tax income.  It is often several times the cost of raising the children.  High “child support” causes federal kickbacks that fund courts and snowballs this monster further.

-Most fathers are loving and care deeply for their children and the vast majority pay child support as ordered, even though it is often onerous and places them in poverty.

-“There is a fundamental liberty right guaranteed to both parents by the 14th Amendment. This is the right to the care, custody, and nurture of their children. According to the Supreme Court of the United States: “Absent a Compelling State Interest of harm or potential harm to the child, the State may not intervene in the privacy of family life.””

(Fathers Unite)

Press play below for HN's official response to the current epidemic of "fatherlessness" in spite of what has been deemed fair and equitable “family court” practices (as self-assessed by the family courts who have turned fatherlessness into a rapidly growing industry-  no conflict in interest there)After all, don't we go all out to make it possible for “Absent Deadbeat Dads” (a sweeping generalized term that does little to connect fathers and children) to become dedicated fathers?  How could they possibly screw up?  Haven't court judgments effecting a child's right to a father been historically fair?  Is it really so simple to assume that so many fathers are inherently bad parents?  Or is there a much larger problem behind the current epidemic?  We've acknowledged the difficulties of being a single mother, but have we even begun to look at the need of more support for single fathers?  After all, it's 2008 and our society professes the ideal that both parents are expected to shoulder the responsibilities of parenting equally...  What has Massachusetts done to help single fathers?  Even in today's modern age, such sentiments leave some dads open to attacks and ridicule, especially from those hanging on dearly to the many blatant double standards that literally leave fathers out in the cold. 

Dedicated to every frustrated father (myself included) who has ever become discouraged with the DOR and the "family courts" in Massachusetts - just 2 of the many negative draconian factors stacked against responsible fatherhood.  Massachusetts needs to take a serious look at the economics of the systematic disenfranchisement of willing dads.  Other states and other countries have much more equitable parenting laws that benefit all children.  In the meantime, sometimes all a Massachusetts guy who just simply wants to be a Massachusetts dad can do is shrug...

Sometimes homeless single fathers are forced to live with goats:


  • The best interest of the children statute is a joke, and the poster who blabs about some alleged deadbeat dad case is talking out his hiney. How can a guy be a deadbeat dad if he is paying his court ordered child support? How does this nitwit know what factors the court used to determine support obligation? The eighty dollars a week was based on a variety of factors, none of which the poster is aware. In the case the poster is referring to, the mother received a mortgage free house and all its contents, child support and alimony, has a well paying job, and a second husband with whom she has other children. This mother consistently refused to allow the father his rightful visitation to the children, and the courts did nothing to enforce visitation rights of fathers. Christmas, birthday gifts and letters were thrown away, effectively alienating children from their dad. Phone calls to the children were not answered, and messages were not returned. This abusive behavior is considered MALICIOUS MOTHER`S SYNDROME, and it is not all that uncommon, especially in Massachusetts, where fathers are often criminalized for trying to be fathers to their children. This father went to court 44 times over a period of 7 years to exercise his court ordered right to see his children. The mother simply refused, and the judge just issued another order, which was defied by the mother over and over again. We need a strong father`s rights group on Cape Cod, as kids grow up, move away from their abusive mothers, and end up in extensive therapy because of the abandonment issues they suffered at the hands of their malicious mothers.
    (Posted by Botello, 07 February, 2008 16:14:03)
  • best intererest of the children- you have it backwards. the state should not interfere with a parent's right to parent, like they are big brother... other states don't. and who says the majority should be "punished" for the actions of a very few. and who said dads should pay support when they have to provide for their kids when they have them, which usually turns out to be a lot these days? (why not split the difference on costs...) women make just as much as men these days, if not more... it's 2008, not 1955! you are talking napolianic nonsense! this is america and there a cival laws that require due process, not systematic descrimination based on gender!... please go back back to your cave, or at least stop being so predjudice based on gender. people like you are the problem. not the random disenfranchised parent who becomes a "criminal" for being a mom or dad. EQUAL PARENTING LAWS NOW. (the alternative is the continuing deterioration of our society and decline in the population of Massachusetts, a state i once loved, yet one which has become the DEEP SOUTH of parenting with its draconian bs!)
    (Posted by Dr. Drake, 19 January, 2008 10:21:58)
  • What about fathers that only have to pay $80.00 per week child support for 2 children and don't even do that? Fathers that don't get their children Christmas or birthday gifts for years and years and aren't involved in their children's lives. What about deadbeat dads who get paid under the table so as to not have to pay child support for their children? Or the ones who don't put their assets in their own name and use different addrresses? That is a gisgrace! That is the real crime. Those are the ones who make it difficult for the rest of you fathers that are involved in your children's lives and who try to do the right thing. I would be more upset that those deadbeats are ruining it for you. I am sure it is impossible to tell who is telling the truth and who is lying about their incomes.
    (Posted by best interest of the children, 18 January, 2008 21:29:33)
  • GOOD RIDDANCE JUDGE ROBERT TERRY! Cape Cod's #1 CHILD ABUSER!!!
    (Posted by Jessica, Katie & Stephanie, 18 January, 2008 12:58:37)
  • What is sad is what our Family Courts do to children. Pre divorce, both parents have legal custody of the child(ren). When the parties file for divorce the first thing the courts do is take away custody from one fit parent(aka Father) Why do they do this? So that they may now order that fit parent to pay child support of which that court gets Federal money through Title IV-D. Our Family Courts are destroying children for their own financial gain! Wake up America! Justice is coming! F4J.US
    (Posted by Steve McDonough, 18 January, 2008 12:47:12)
comment Comments (11 posted)



Most Popular
Support HyannisNews.com: Visit Our Advertisers