header Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites | RSS/Atom | Sitemap | Contact us
Search the Site   Advanced »
Sections


Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930




email Email to a friend | print Print version | Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us | Digg this story Digg this comment Comments (0 posted)

Big Dig Contractor Charged

By News Desk on 26 June, 2008 20:14:00

image

BIG DIG CONTRACTOR, MODERN CONTINENTAL, CHARGED

.

MODERN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION (“MCC”), the largest

construction contractor on the Central Artery/Tunnel project (“CA/T”), was charged today in

federal court with making false statements in connection with its execution of construction

documents certifying the quality of the work it performed on certain contracts, submitting false

time and materials slips on contracts, and with wire fraud

.

United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan, Theodore L. Doherty III, Special Agent in

Charge of the Department of Transportation Inspector General’s Office in New England, Warren

T. Bamford, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Boston Office,

and Gordon S. Heddell, Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Labor

Racketeering announced today that
MCC, a Cambridge, MA company, was charged in a multicount

Information.

.

The Information alleges that
MCC made false statements concerning the quality of the

construction work it performed on two CA/T contracts, C17A1 and CO9B2. The C17A1

contract was for the construction of the Tip O’Neil Tunnel from Congress Street to High Street.

The CO9B2 contract was for the finish work in the I-90 Connector Tunnel. The Information

alleges that
MCC knowingly executed documents stating that the two contracts were built inaccordance with the contract documents and procedures, when in fact MCC was aware that it

had not built the contracts in accordance with those documents and procedures. On September

15, 2004, a defect in slurry wall panel EO-45 caused the slurry wall to blowout, resulting in

extensive traffic delays and, ultimately, the discovery of numerous other unrepaired defects in

the slurry walls built by
MCC. On July 10, 2006, a ceiling module installed by MCC in the

portal area of the I-90 Connector tunnel, using concrete anchors installed with epoxy, collapsed

and killed a motorist passing through the tunnel. After the collapse, a tunnel inspection revealed

a systemic failure of the epoxy anchors throughout the tunnel. In both instances,
MCC was

aware at, or near, the time it constructed the slurry walls and the installed the tunnel ceiling that

it was not adhering to the contract documents.

.

Specifically,
MCC knowingly failed to properly and fully execute concrete placement

cards documenting the pouring of the concrete in the slurry walls, knowingly failed to meet the

written specifications for the slurry mix used in the construction process and knowingly signed a

certification that panel EO-45, among other defective panels, was built to specifications when

MCC was aware it was not.

.

It is further alleged that MCC also knowingly executed certifications that various

sections of the I-90 Connector Tunnel were built in accordance with plans and specifications.

One aspect of that concerned the use of concrete anchors installed with epoxy used to support the

ceiling system. According to the Information, in or about December 1999
MCC became aware,

through documents in its possession, that the epoxy it was using for the concrete anchors was in

fact not appropriate for long-term loads such as the ceiling. It is alleged that, despite this

knowledge,
MCC continued to use the epoxy after December 1999 and executed the false

certifications.

.

The Information also alleges that
MCC engaged in a scheme of over-billing the Central

Artery/Tunnel Project by falsely categorizing apprentice workers as journeyman on a variety of

CA/T contracts. The work was performed on a time and materials (T & M) basis, which meant

the contractor,
MCC, was paid for the time spent by each worker, as opposed to a fixed price forthe work under contract. MCC was also paid 10% of its total T & M billings to cover overhead,

plus an additional 10% of that total for a profit margin. The scheme involved hundreds of

instances of over-billing, totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Additionally, the Information charges
MCC with wire fraud in connection with its

receipt of electronic payment for the inadequate and non-specification work it knowingly

performed on the contracts discussed above.

.

United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan said, “This is yet another example of the

ongoing commitment by the Big Dig Task Force to vigorously investigate those who have

perpetrated a fraud on American taxpayers. I want to commend the investigators from the

Department of Transportation Inspector General’s Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation

and the U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Labor Racketeering for their outstanding

contributions that led to today’s charges against Modern Continental.” “It is critically important

that federal and state tax dollars needed to fund important public work projects like the Big Dig,

are safeguarded against waste, fraud and corruption. As I have said before, we will leave no

stone unturned, and will continue to dedicate the resources necessary to complete a

comprehensive review and investigation of the Big Dig Project,” concluded Sullivan.

If convicted of these charges
MCC faces criminal fines of up to $500,000 and payment

of restitution.

 

The case was investigated by the Department of Transportation, Inspector General’s

Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Department of Labor - Office of Labor

Racketeering. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Fred M. Wyshak, Jeffrey M.

Cohen, Anthony E. Fuller and Eugenia M. Carris of Sullivan’s Public Corruption Unit.

The details contained in the Information are allegations. The defendant is presumed to be

innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

(from FBI Boston Field Office)


comment Comments (0 posted)



Most Popular
Support HyannisNews.com: Visit Our Advertisers